Thanks, if you'd like a v2 to apply please let me know.
> Since it's not coming off a maintainer tree *quite* yet as it hasn't
> been yet applied (I think).
> If it gets applied to that tree in time for this to be applied to ours
> it shouldn't be much trouble to add a cherry picked line with the
> maintainer's tree when we apply it to ours.
> Acked-by: Connor Kuehl <[hidden email]>
The bug report was missing most tasks and maybe I should just have ignored this
submission until that were fixed (to treat everyone with the same grumpyness).
But at the same time there are some other aspects to this which are helpful to
discuss, so I went ahead and cleaned up the bug report tasks.
I have set the disco task to "Won't Fix" because this is specific to certain
laptops and for that reason better suited to go into oem-osp1 (since Disco goes
EOL on Jan-23).
For Bionic: normally I would like to see only changes which have landed upstream
in a LTS tree. But this is just adding quirks for very specific laptop models,
so it would be too harsh to insist on that rule. But generally I think we should
be more conservative with those long term trees.