|
On 25/03/12 10:48, scoundrel50a wrote:
> On 25/03/2012 10:18, alan c wrote: >> On 23/03/12 22:11, scoundrel50a wrote: >>> On 23/03/2012 22:04, Alan Pope wrote: >>> On 23/03/12 21:45, Daniel Case wrote: >>>>>> On 23 March 2012 21:21, Neil Greenwood >>>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> They spent lots of money testing different behaviours >>>>>> In my opinion, this is where the problem lies. The main people >>>>>> Linux attracts, no matter which way you look at it, are hackers (in >>>>>> the general sense). >>> That's exactly the problem we're trying to solve. Not asking the >>> target audience, but only asking hackers would be arrogant and >>> foolhardy. That's why we don't do that. We do listen to feedback, more >>> than you'd imagine, and decisions taken about design (for example) are >>> directly affected by user feedback. That doesn't happen for every >>> minute decision, but it happens. >>> >>> We're also making it easier to buy computers with Ubuntu pre-installed >>> by talking to hardware vendors, to get it shipped from the factory. >>> It's hard work and takes a long time to do but we're getting there. >>> >>>>>> Which brings me back to my first point, who's going to advocate >>>>>> Ubuntu if it annoys the hacker and makes life more difficult? >>>>>> >>> Those of us who do like it, do use it and believe it is the right path >>> for Ubuntu to take. If you don't then you have a number of options:- >>> >>> * Install a different desktop environment on your Ubuntu system >>> * Join the discussion on the various Ubuntu development lists to >>> articulate how we're doing things wrong >>> * Test and file bugs when things don't work correctly >>> * Provide patches or programs to help Ubuntu& Unity to appeal >>> >>> Personally I am in this for the long haul. Each 6 monthly release is >>> fantastic, but I'm thinking years away from now, and I'm happy to >>> persevere through the rough times because I think the long term goal >>> is worth it. >>> >>> Frankly if people who are "inside" our community, "hackers" as you >>> call them aren't willing to get stuck in then Linux Mint, Debian, >>> Fedora and hundreds of other distros are -> that way. Enjoy! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> oooh and who took your dummy away.......that was my reaction when I read >>> that.......but the thing is, you work for Canonical, so your going to >>> say that, whatever happens........what is frustrating is people on here >>> are giving an opinion and its being thrown aside is if it doesnt matter >>> because you have all this research into what people like, but people are >>> here telling you different, that has been going on since 11.04 people >>> have said they dont like it......and its not getting better its getting >>> worse..... >> I think that is an unfair response. Alan has personally given me >> unbelievable support over many years for my activities as a volunteer >> advocate of FLOSS and Ubuntu. >> What he says is sensible and quite proper, and I am delighted that he >> has the courage to post on this group. > I am glad that he has been helpful to you, but this thread has shown a > different side, one that says, if you dont like it go elsewhere, is that > helpful, that is effectively telling people he has no time for them, > that isnt consistent.....if he keeps saying that people will start going > elsewhere......is that what you really want? On the contrary. I went up to a counter in a (french) market and asked for a cup of tea. I was treated politely, however they explained they were a restaurant counter only and did not serve drinks, however they were careful to direct me to a nearby counter which was a bar, and served exactly what wanted. the same happened when I went into a shop wantnig a bottle of milk. I got directed to another shop 400 meters away, and did manage to get what I wanted. It is, surely, quite appropriate to be directed to a place to get what you say you want? Anything else would be unhelpful. -- alan cocks -- [hidden email] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ |
|
In reply to this post by Alan Bell
On 25/03/12 11:08, Alan Bell wrote:
> little stopping you from actually dragging it in the direction you want > to go. Really. Participate remotely online in the developer summit that Oh I perhaps should mention. I had an idea for a minor improvement (I think 'significant' .... ) in how Launcher icons react. I raised a bug, also contacted the lead developer on the desktop, and before long the bug was accepted. Will be in a very very long queue though, but I can say with certainty that Unity is open to change. -- alan cocks -- [hidden email] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ |
|
In reply to this post by Daniel Case-2
On 23/03/12 21:06, Daniel Case wrote:
> I'm not saying don't evolve, just evolve in a way that most users > agree is a good idea, so how do we define what most users want? Perhaps by doing rather a lot of user testing http://davidplanella.wordpress.com/2011/08/02/looking-for-testers-in-london/ https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2011-April/032988.html http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/11/user-testing-of-unity-reveals-some-surprising-results/ this does of course lead to certain problems when they don't give the users time to sober up first https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/764905 but in the main it seems a reasonable approach. > I thought that was the aim of Linux? not really, Linux is just the kernel. > Who's driving the development course here? The users or canonical? the contributors to the project, which is mostly but not exclusively Canonical. Why would you think that the users drive the development course? -- Libertus Solutions http://libertus.co.uk -- [hidden email] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ |
|
In reply to this post by Daniel Case-2
On 23/03/12 22:23, Daniel Case wrote:
> I've been in the Ubuntu community for 5 years already and don't plan > on leaving any time soon, but I think there needs to be some > representation of the hacker culture that Ubuntu has built up over the > years so that we can find the middle ground, it seems to me as though > Canonical wants to believe that we are not here! I think that there has been emotional hurt and upset which may have been difficult but not impossible to avoid. I trust that ubuntu will weather this with time, but I would have liked to have seen a situation when a very senior Canonical marketing resource would have handled some of the inevitable community pain a bit more elegantly. Although it would be somewhat unprecedented in a normal business environment. But like a racing car, the direction can be changed in an instant. I trust Ubuntu will win! -- alan cocks -- [hidden email] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ |
|
In reply to this post by Liam Proven
On 24/03/12 01:38, Liam Proven wrote:
> However, I do think that Unity in general is not /nearly/ as > customisable as Linux users tend to be used to. I would expect more customisable options as time goes on. I have read a statement which said that it was not policy to lack customise options, but first things first. -- alan cocks -- [hidden email] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ |
|
In reply to this post by alan c-2
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:06:04 +0100
alan c wrote: > On 24/03/12 11:08, Chris Penston wrote: > > [snip of really good stuff] > > > People tend to be impressed by the novelty > > that they have a choice. Almost always, the reaction is > > astonishment that something can be so good without costing anything > > 'so there must be a catch'. > > Yes I find that a lot, also. It is difficult explaining that although > there is no such thing as a free lunch (probably true), that there > *is* Libre software. I think I've posted on here before with my 2 principle examples. In no particular order: 1) "Doing in their spare time? It can't be any good then": Just because somebody does it for free (possibly in their spare time) does not mean that it is of a lower quality than paid-for software. Indeed many people who contribute to Free Software projects maintain paid-for jobs doing the same thing - many Free Software programmers have paid-for jobs writing software; many Free Software designers have paid-for jobs doing design work. Just because they also do so for free does not mean their Free work is of a lesser quality. A professional footballer playing a charity match won't play any worse because they're not getting paid for it. 2) "But they're highly-paid professionals. The average Jo(e) couldn't do that". Yes they can. St. John's Ambulance. Average people putting their knowledge and skills to use helping their community. Grant. -- [hidden email] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ |
|
In reply to this post by scoundrel50agmail
On 25/03/12 11:11, scoundrel50a wrote:
> its taking me forever to get > used to Ubuntu, trying another distro isnt going to work....plus, from > what I can see, a lot of you are members of other distros too.....this > distro is enough.... (I do wish you well with the health problems) I find that Lubuntu is pretty comfortable, and IIRC it is possible to install a ppa offering gnome desktop, or at least it gave pretty familiar menus etc. All of these and maybe more, can be installed as desktop sessions, into Ubuntu, and chosen at logon. -- alan cocks -- [hidden email] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ |
|
In reply to this post by Grant Phillips-Sewell
On 25 Mar 2012, at 11:47, Grant Phillips-Sewell wrote:
Hello!
-- [hidden email] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ |
|||||
|
In reply to this post by Liam Proven
Liam Proven wrote:
> Unity is getting quite mature now. None of what I'm proposing is new > code - this is all either restoring features that were one present, or > things that have been accomplished by hacks, config tweaks and so on. > It's all doable. But it's not getting any more configurable - in fact, > options are /disappearing./ This is a very serious error of judgement, > I think. I do maintain that Gnome3 is what happened when the Gnome developers decided that Gnome 2 was too configurable by half, which wasn't long after everyone else decided it was nicely customisable. In more seriousness, I think Unity's likely to go down the route of Gnome 3, where the customisability and features that people want and expect are provided by extensions and plugins[0] rather than the core product itself. That frees up the Unity developers to focus completely on the functionality that Canonical regard as important and means that they don't need to support other people's daft ideas, and gets the DE back towards the modular approach that's so invaluable for the rest of the OS. This does, of course, completely break the assumption that every Unity/Gnome3 install is roughly the same (which, apparently, is one of the plus sides of making it hard to customise), but I suspect that in environments where that's desirable it's trivial to simply prevent the installation of these extensions to force people to maintain a normal UI. -- Avi [0] I have no idea about Unity's architecture here, though I've heard mention of plugins and add-ons for it. -- [hidden email] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ |
|
In reply to this post by scoundrel50agmail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On 25/03/12 10:48, scoundrel50a wrote: > I am glad that he has been helpful to you, but this thread has > shown a different side, one that says, if you dont like it go > elsewhere, is that helpful, that is effectively telling people he > has no time for them, that isnt consistent.....if he keeps saying > that people will start going elsewhere......is that what you really > want? > It's less "if you dont like it go elsewhere" and more "if all you're going to do is bitch and not actually do anything constructive then we probably won't mourn your disappearance". We already get an awful lot of feedback about Unity, Ubuntu and all the bits and pieces around it. I'm not saying we don't need more feedback, just that the feedback needs to be targeted to the right place, at the right time and in the right language. For example. A mail to the Ubuntu-UK mailing list saying "Unity sucks, I'm switching to Mint" isn't even remotely useful to anyone at all. A mail to the Unity-design list saying "I've noticed that the icons react in a way that doesn't match the design" or "I've installed Ubuntu for a number of users and they've all commented on how hard it is to access their devices, I suggest the following changes" perhaps with a picture to explain how it can be improved, is likely to be more useful. Making Ubuntu better requires work on all sides, firing hate messages into the sky doesn't work at all. Cheers, - -- Alan Pope Engineering Manager Canonical - Product Strategy +44 (0) 7973 620 164 [hidden email] http://ubuntu.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPbxcgAAoJEMx6UFtfvV4we0QH/A6Lsp2hPtLTg+yiPy32UnjV dob6xu+F1W3AZXVXqv+IF3GVOT5dWZMJiLsgsQ3YcyYqw5CVxUbUnDgLkv8r0s29 KFFp4tI5bW25G0pHccDAh3iMi0vtpvwNcPG3UYZw1vynCMEEC0kolk6goTiurO8J UiN5Y2EXxI4/1B6nlSMNxo6nCP91vRM1cW04RnNK5grPLi5P2CwRCB+zoi4DqzJ5 ycl3FP/VWMBdnu0Y1jhLDKBlwwZ4IvfA76ysLmqJRUfbfKjWT/s3fDfI5X6gp4AA ri/1bMr90ii67hOPcuXJBF2oQU0qczIKrp8D/oi3YXvjzTpGOZLsulnszvg+4z4= =l1BZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [hidden email] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ |
|
In reply to this post by Grant Phillips-Sewell
On 25/03/12 11:47, Grant Phillips-Sewell wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:06:04 +0100 > alan c wrote: > >> On 24/03/12 11:08, Chris Penston wrote: >> >> [snip of really good stuff] >> >>> People tend to be impressed by the novelty >>> that they have a choice. Almost always, the reaction is >>> astonishment that something can be so good without costing anything >>> 'so there must be a catch'. >> Yes I find that a lot, also. It is difficult explaining that although >> there is no such thing as a free lunch (probably true), that there >> *is* Libre software. > I think I've posted on here before with my 2 principle examples. In no > particular order: > > 1) "Doing in their spare time? It can't be any good then": > Just because somebody does it for free (possibly in their spare > time) does not mean that it is of a lower quality than paid-for > software. Indeed many people who contribute to Free Software projects > maintain paid-for jobs doing the same thing - many Free Software > programmers have paid-for jobs writing software; many Free Software > designers have paid-for jobs doing design work. Just because they also > do so for free does not mean their Free work is of a lesser quality. A > professional footballer playing a charity match won't play any worse > because they're not getting paid for it. > > 2) "But they're highly-paid professionals. The average Jo(e) couldn't > do that". > Yes they can. St. John's Ambulance. Average people putting their > knowledge and skills to use helping their community. How about volunteer coaches, people at sports clubs, volunteer web masters, people who perhaps volunteer in a child protection role, you expect them to do their job including ensuring others are doing their job properly, paid or unpaid if you are a club child welfare officer you have a great deal of responsibility. this can really clash with employment, > > Grant. Yeah I like the 2nd analogy, However it seems rather worrying that people who think that doing something unpaid means they are not doing a good job, in fact this could be seen as highly offensive and insulting. We find errors in Windows., hear about bugs, get viruses and just carry on and seem to put up with it, despite paying for the software (ok the cost is hidden in a new computer) and yet when we try free software we brand it poor if it does not live up to what we expect, maybe we still expect too much. Is this free software must be bad because its free attitude. world wide does it vary by country, it seems other countries are more willing to try, are more open minded, maybe we need to do some research in to where this issue crops up and then see if we can solve it, by learning from where it is doing well., It seems countries such as Africa embrace free software, I think i read that Brazil does because it wants its financial assets to say in Brazil rather than going in to the pockets of executives in the USA, so people have different reasons, they use it because it works not because it's free, it works because they are open minded, and willing to try new things willing to learn new things, something that some countries find hard either way. Paul -- -- http://www.zleap.net http://www.ubuntu.com skype : psutton111 http://www.linkedin.com/pub/paul-sutton/36/595/911 -- [hidden email] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ |
|
In reply to this post by alan c-2
On 25/03/12 11:06, alan c wrote:
I am glad you brought this up. Whilst going over the free software concept with my neighbour whilst setting ubuntu on a USB stick for her to try out she mentioned "So there is not going to be pop ups asking me for purchasing such and such or asking for donations?". I was happy to say no. But that there where places where she could donate to help the cause. I normally just tell them that there are big companies competing against each other using the same product and they can use each others improvements so the user is always a winner.On 24/03/12 11:08, Chris Penston wrote: [snip of really good stuff]People tend to be impressed by the novelty that they have a choice. Almost always, the reaction is astonishment that something can be so good without costing anything 'so there must be a catch'.Yes I find that a lot, also. It is difficult explaining that although there is no such thing as a free lunch (probably true), that there *is* Libre software. But then, there is -some- good in the world. I was in Paris for a short trip recently and on two occasions, complete strangers helped with acts of kindness. One gent insisted I took his seat on a crowded bus (1) and later that day I (we) were lost on the Metro and a couple noticed this and helped us get sorted. 1) He looked at least as old as I am! But I guess he saw my walking stick and also I was very unpractised and clumsy trying to get a hand hold. Slightly embarrassing to get noticed in such a way, but heartwarming and appreciated nevertheless.'keep calm and carry on!' The times are changing.Yay! And this also lets me share something I suspected but had not basis for it. If someone wants scientific and historical evidence as to why people are now kinder (and give out free lunch!) I could refer them to two books. [1] ¨The better angels our our nature¨ written by Steven Pinker which I am reading now goes over the historical reasons and shows how we are less violent now. That is even taking into account the WW1&2! [2] "Wired for culture: The natural history of human cooperation" By Mark Pagel have not read it yet (looking it up in Calibre as I write these lines) but shows how we where able to evolve quicker than other animals because we found cooperation to be more effective. I will probably use these as arguments for the harder to convince. PS: Sorry to the links to newspaper that might not be everybody’s cup of tea but it is where I get my podcast from. [1] http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/audio/2012/mar/19/science-weekly-podcast-wired-culture http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/audio/2012/mar/19/science-weekly-podcast-wired-culture -- Sent from my Ubuntu desktop -- [hidden email] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
